Tests

How to determine the type of complex proposal. Make a scheme of complex proposals

Subordinate clause - The syntactically dependent predicative part of the complex proposal containing the subordinate union or the union word.

For example: Vladimir saw the horror, that he drove into an unfamiliar forest (Pushkin). Portray which I experienced at that time, very hard (Korolenko). Used by training practice term "subordinate clause" Usually replaced in theoretical works by the term “podep part” (respectively, instead of the "main sentence" - "main part"); Thereby avoids the use of the same term "proposal" in relation to everything and to the individual components of its parts, and also emphasizes the interconnection of the structural parts of the complex proposal.

Subordinate clause It may be associated with a separate word (group of words) of the main offer, performing the function of distribution or explanation of these members.

For example: She dreams like it goes on snow clearing (Pushkin) (Put supply proposal disseminates the faithful main offer). His nature was one of those who need a public for a good case.(L. Tolstoy) (Pressing offer explains the word group one of those).

In other cases, the apparent proposal relates to the whole of the main offer.

For example: If the grandfather went out of the house, the grandmother sat in the kitchen the most interesting meetings (Bitter) (apparent proposal refers to the main thing as a whole).

Pressing proposal can clarify the word in the main thing that is not a member of the sentence.

For example: Grow, the country, where the will of the united peoples merged into one people! (Lebedev-Kumach) Pressure offer refers to the word-handling Country).

Pressing proposal may relate to two main proposals in general.

For example: Already completely dawn and the people began to rise when I returned to my room(L. Tolstoy).

Classification of species of additives

In school textbooks present two types of classifications of pressing proposals.

In the complexes of TA Ladyzhenskaya and M.M. Remembrance are divided into three groups: determinatory , issuctive and circumstantial ; The latter are divided into subgroups.

In the complex V.V. Babeva Podepi shared on subject , taken , determinatory , additionaland circumstantial depending on which a member of the Offer is replaced by the Putting Office (issues specified for various sentences of suggestions are used to define the type of appropriate).

Since a more common in the practice of school and pre-university teaching is a classification adopted in complexes T.A. Ladyzhenskaya and M.M. Razumovskaya, turn to her.

Imagine information about the types of additive proposals in the form of a consolidated table.

Types of pressing offers

*1. Determination* (including location-definition)	Answer questions What? whose? Who exactly? what exactly? and relate to noun or pronoun in the main part; joined most often with the help of union words which which whose whose where et al. and alliances what is that and etc.	Native places where I grew will forever stay in my heart; He who does nothing, nothing will reach; She looked with such a kind, that everyone silenced.
*2. Anonymous*	They answer questions of indirect cases and are usually believed to be led in the main part; joined with the help of unions what is that if if if et al. and union words where, where, how much, which and etc.	I soon realized that I was lost; It seemed to him, as if all around his happiness was happy.
*3. Constentive:*
*Image of action, measures and degrees*	Answer questions as? how? To what extent? in what degree? How much? and usually belong to one word in the main sentence; joined with the help of unions what is like, exactlyand union words How, how much how much.	We are so tired, that could not go further.
*of time*	Answer questions when? From what time? what time? how long? when, while, as, while, as depression, as long as, barely, since, just, just before, as soon as, only just, just, only Only a little, earlier than before.	Until the rain stopsWe will have to sit at home.
Places	Answer questions Where? where to? where?and are usually among the whole main sentence; joined with the help of union words where, where, from where.	The folk practitioner is going to where the people's traditions of the song are still alive.
*goal*	Answer questions what for? for what purpose? and are usually among the whole main sentence; joined with the help of unions to, in order to, so that, so that in order, if only, yes, just.	In order not to get lostWe entered the path.
*the reasons*	Answer questions why? from what? for what reason?and are usually among the whole main sentence; joined with the help of alliances because, because, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, due to the fact that, then, since, for, since, because, due to the fact that, especially since .	Because the candle burned weaklyThe room was almost dark.
conditions	Answer the question with what condition? and are usually among the whole main sentence; joined with the help of unions if, if, when, if, kababi, how, if soon, if ... Lee.	If during the day the weather does not improveThe campaign will have to be transferred.
*concessions*	Answer questions despite what? Contrary to what? and are usually among the whole main sentence; joined with the help of unions although, despite the fact that, despite the fact that, let and combinations of location words with a particle neither as nor, where no, where neither.	Despite the fact that it was already far over fullb, guests did not disperse; Like nor a tree, it grows everything up.
*Comparison*	Answer questions like what? like who? What? What? and are usually among the whole main sentence; joined with the help of unions As, just as, as if, as if, for sure, as if, as if that.	Birch branches stretch to the sun, as if they stretch his hands.
*Corollary*	Answer questions as a result of what happened? What follows from this? and are usually among the whole main sentence; joined with the help of the Union so that.	Summer was not very roast so the crop mushrooms should be good.

Candidate spectacle can join the main part with a particle lieused in the meaning of the Union.

For example: He did not know if tomorrow would come. Union-particle lie It can serve to transfer an indirect question: They asked if we would go with them.

Remember: the main thing to determine the type of pressing proposals is a semantic question.

Unions and allied words can be made to a complex proposal additional shades of value.

For example: The village, where he missed Eugene, was an adorable corner. it complete proposal with apparent determination having an additional spatial shade of value.

In Russian, a group stands out complexed proposals, the apparent parts of which cannot be called neither definitive, nor thanctative or circumstances. it completed proposals with appointed attachments .

Such apparent contain additional, passing, add message To the main part of the complex proposal. In this sense, such appendages are often approaching the value to the plug-in structures.

The means of communication in them are allied words what, why, why, why, as a result et al., which seem to be repeated in a generalized form content of the main part.

For example: His enemies, his friends, that maybe the sameHe was chilled and soy. (A. Pushkin) Yamchika decided to ride the river, what was supposed to cut the naga path three worst. (A. Pushkin)
There is no question to the connecting additive, since in the main part of the complex proposal there is no word, phrases that would require the presence of the pressing part.

Algorithm for determining the appendage

1. Determine the main part of the complex proposal.

2. Determine the reference word in the main part (if it is).

3. Set the question from the main part of the pressing offer:

b) from the faith in the main part;

c) from noun or pronouns in the main part;

d) It is impossible to ask a question to the apparent (with connecting and comparable).

4. Specify the means of communication in the apparent part ( unions or Union words).

5. Name the appendage of the departure.

If the compilation of circuits for complex proposals still presents complexity for you, read this article carefully. It contains examples of complex proposals with the schemes of all possible species. Thoughtfully familiarize yourself with them - and the task is to make a scheme for complex offer No longer seem difficult for you.

What is a complex proposal

Combined complex They call the proposal, the predicative parts of which are in unequal relationships in relation to each other. One of the parts is the main one, the other (others) is the apparent, i.e. dependent on the main one. Submission of the pressing proposal is expressed with the help of subordinate unions and allied words.

In addition, the apparent proposal may apply to the entire main proposal as a whole (that is, to distribute it) or to some word in its composition.

Types of complex proposals in value

Depending on what unions and allied words, the pressing offer is joined by the main and what semantic relationships are between the parts of the NGN, the latter are divided into several types. To be shorter, we will call the types of complex proposals by appropriate types:

Podepie thanksnaya. Communication with the main proposal is carried out at the expense of unions what, how, whether.

Father said that Mom will return from work late.

[ … ], (what …).

Podepie definition. Communication with the main proposal is carried out with the help of allied words what, whose, what, where, where, from where, how.

No one could remember whose yellow umbrella stood all evening in the corner.

[...], (whose ...).

Podepie attachment. Communication with the main proposal is carried out with the help of allied words why, why, whyall the case forms of the word what.

Explain to me really, why Nastya does it all.

[ … ], (what for …).

Podepie circumstance. This value expresses a large number of unions and allied words. Therefore, this type of NGN is divided into several sub-clauses - depending on which circumstances express the means of communication (alliances and allied words).

The children looked forward to when, finally, the holiday will come, and the Christmas tree will bring to the house.

[...], (when ...), a (...).

Circumstantial values:

places (Means of communication of the Podep and the main parts - union words where, where, from where);

For a long time Brere, stumbling, and went out in the evening to the edge, from where it was visible to the city to the city.

[...], (from where ...).

of time when, so far, only);

And she all called and cried, cried and called, until the window was finally opened.

[ … ], (until …).

conditions (means of communication of the apparent and main parts - the Union if a etc.);

If you now go straight, turn right on the corner, you can go straight to the library.

(if ...), [then ...].

the reasons (Communication Means of Press and Main Parts - Unions because since);

Children often come against the wills of parents, because younger want to try your own strength faster.

[ … ], (because…).

goal to);

To achieve a dream, you will have to try well.

(To ...), [...].

corollary(means of communication of the apparent and main parts - the Union so that);

The actor was preparing a lot for listening, so he could get a role.

[ ... ], (so that…).

concessions (means of communication of the apparent and main parts - the Union although);

Although I have never risen into the air in a balloon, driving a burner and keep the basket at the desired height turned out not so difficult.

(although …), [ … ].

comparison(Communication Means of Press and Main Parts - Unions as if, as if);

Everything spisled and sailed before my eyes, as if a stupid colored carousel was handing me in a circle.

[...], (as if ...).

measures and degrees (Communication Means of Press and Main Parts - Unions that to and allied words how much how much);

I can not express in words how many of these people are grateful to you for timely help!

[...], (how much ...).

image image (Communication Means of Press and Main Parts - Unions that, as if, how, exactly, as if, like And the Union Word as).

Gather with the Spirit and Dance So, as if there is not a single person around the big hall.

[...], (as if ...).

PUBLIC'S POSITION IN SPP

As you might pay attention, looking at complex proposals with schemes, the provisions of the main and departing proposals are not fixed rigidly, you can come up with several diverse combinations.

Pressing proposal can be located before the main thing:

Whatever difficulties have done to wait on the way, you must stubbornly go to your cherished goal!

(what kind …), [ … ].

The apparent offer can be located after the main thing:

Go to my mother, ask her to help us.

[...], (...).

Pressing proposal may be included inside the main thing:

Everywhere wherever we go, we were accompanied by surprised views.

[ …, (where to …), … ].

It is obvious that the apparent in the NGN does not have to be alone. There may be several them. Then it is worth considering all the options for what kind of relationships are between the pressing offers and the main thing.

It is worth it to be clarified, the scheme of a complex proposal may be not only linear ( horizontal), as in the examples above. In order to clearly demonstrate the dependent relationship between the main proposal and several apparent, the flowcharts are better suited ( vertical).

So, for several addicts there are such cases:

Collection scheme of complex proposal

A reasonable question may arise, why do you need all these SPP schemes. They have at least one applied destination - a mandatory part of the syntactic parsing of a complex proposal is to compile its scheme.

In addition, the scheme of the complex proposal will help properly analyze it for the parsing.

SPP parsing scheme Includes the following task items:

To determine what proposal is to the goal of the statement: a narrative, questioning or motivating.
What - by emotional color: exclamation or non-visible.
To prove that the proposal is precisely difficult, it is necessary to determine and designate the grammatical foundations.
Note what kind of communication of parts of a complex offer is present: an allied connection, intonation.
Specify the type of complex offer: a complex proposal.
Specify how many simple suggestions are part of a complex, what means are attached put supply offers To the main one.
Denote the main and pressing part. In the case of a complex proposal with several additives, they should be denoted by their numbers (subordination degree).
Specify with what word in the main sentence (or with the whole proposal) is associated with an appropriate offer.
Mark the method of communication of the predicative parts of a complex proposal: the Union or the Union Word.
If they are, denoted in the main part of the indicative words.
Specify the type of pressing: anonymous, determinant, connecting, circumstantial.
And finally, make a scheme of a complex proposal.

To be clearer sample analysis Completed proposal:

Offer narrative, unkonsectative, complex. This is a complex proposal, which includes four simple sentences. Means of communication: intonation, union word when, Submitting Soyuz what.

SNP consists of one main and three departing proposals: the first (2) and second (3) departies are determined, both spread the word day In the main sentences and answer the question? With each other related to the writing union and.The third appropriate offer (4) circumstances (measures and degrees) extends to the leakage of the second subordinate supply (3) and answers questions how much? To what extent?

Thus, this is a complex proposal with the subordination of the subordinate the following species: uniform and consistent.

Summary

We examined in detail different schemes of complex sentences with examples. If you thoughtfully read an article, no task associated with NGN will no longer seem difficult to you.

We also stopped at the varieties of SPP schemes (horizontal and vertical). And, most importantly, on how these schemes will help you to do syntactic analysis complex proposal.

the site, with full or partial copying of the material reference to the original source is required.

Semantic relations in complex-in-free proposals are expressed with the help of subordinate unions and allied words. Therefore, their classification is largely similar to the classification of verification unions. Allied means are located in the dressing part. The dressing part may relate to one word in the main part or to the entire main part as a whole.

Types of pressing offers

Main article: Subordinate clause

Pressure proposals are classified for anonymous, determinant, circumstantial and attachment. The first is more often answering the question. who? or what?For them are the unions and allied words: who is what, how, when, why etc. The second most often answering the question what? and have unions and allied words which, which, which, which, that.

Consulative attachments are divided into sentences:

for purpose ( why?, for what purpose?),

places ( where?, where?, where?),

time ( when?, what time?),

the reasons ( why? Why?),

conditions ( with what condition?, in which case?),

image image ( how?, how?),

comparisons ( as? How much?),

concessions ( despite what? Contrary to what?).

There are also apparent consecutive proposals and connecting proposals.

Types of complex proposals with several apparent

Complexed proposals with several additives are divided into the following types:

With consistent submission - The first pressing part obeys the main thing, and each subsequent - to the previous subordinate part.

With homogeneous submission - Approvers belong to one word in the main part or to the whole major part.

With parallel submission (or inhomogeneous) - different types apprehensible subordinate to either the main one or various parts Main.

Complex offer (SSP) - a complex offer with writing bond between its parts. Composite parts of the complex offer grammatically depend on each other, that is, they are equal.

Unlike a complex proposal, in a complex union, it does not include any of the parts and uses the absolute time of the verbs of the faded.

Classification based on grammatical value

Writing communication may be issued by the following relationships in the sentence:

Connected. They are characterized by the value of logical homogeneity. In the time plan - the simultaneousness of two actions or their follows after each other. Communication Tools: Unions and, yes (in meaning and) and etc.; Particles and ... and, nor ... neither, too, also.

Divided. Include sequence, change, alternations, comparisons, or enumerate interrelated events. Communication Tools: Unions or thatrepeating unions or orRepeating particles li .. Lie, either ... either, not that ... not that, and then ... and not that, adverb otherwise as union.

Comparable. Indicate the equivalence, the identity of the situation. Communication Tools: Unions that is, namely.

Explanatory. Include actually comparable, interpreting relationship and non-compliance relationships. Communication Tools: Unions a, but yes (in meaning but), particle same, specifiers and therefore, and therefore, but however, but also, but, and in addition.

Gradual. This is the further development of comparative relationships. Graduation can be according to the degree of importance (Means of communication: unions not only ... but, not that ... but, not even ... the more not, even ... not that, not only that ... also), by degree of intensity (Means of communication: unions if not ... then at least, if not ... then, in this case, not that ... But, not to say ... but), according to the degree of compliance denoted (Means of communication: unions rather, more precisely, Design to be precise).

Relationships combine grammatical values \u200b\u200bthat can be transmitted using unions (and particles as unions) and with the help of specitizers specifying the value of funds, as well as communications ( and then, and from this, and therefore).

1. Complexed proposals (SPP) are proposals in which there is a major proposal and one or more departing offers. Puttinglements are subject to the chief and answer questions from members of the sentence.

before the main sentence:

Since Nonna refused to Andrei, the old man was with non -na officially dry (Panova).

(Since), .

Candidates can stand after the main offer:

what leads through groves (Goncharov).

, (what)

Puttinglements can stand in the middle of the main offer:

And in the evening, when all the cats are sulfur, the prince went to breathe with clean air (Leskov).

[ , (when), ]

2. Puttinglements may relate to one word in the main or to the whole main sentence.

To one word The main sentence includes the following types of apparent:

apparent subjects;
taken (for another classification, the subject and tapered apparens belong to the apparent prime determination);
determinant;
additional (on another classification - anonymable);
image image and degree.

To the whole main sentence The following types of recreational types are usually related:

pressure places, time, causes, consequences, comparisons, goals, conditions, concessions (that is, the circumstantiated types of appendage, except for the apparent image and degree).

Consulative additives, except for the apparent images of action and the degree, as a rule, refer to the entire main proposal, but the question of them is usually set from the faith.

The tycology of the apparent proposals is given on the textbook: Babayitseva V.V., Chesnokova LD Russian language: Theory. 5-9 CL: student. For general education. institutions.

3. Means of communication of the apparent and main sentences are:

in the appropriate sentence - subordination unions ( what, for, for, for now, when, how if et al.) Or allied words ( which, what, who, what, how, where, where, from where, when and etc.);
in the main sentence - Signing words ( the one, there, there, therefore, because etc.).

Unions and allied words are the main means of communication in a complex sentence.

Indexing words in the main sentence may be, and may not be.

Unions and allied words usually stand at the beginning of the pressing offer and serve as an indicator of the border between the main and pressing.

An exception Makes the Union-particle of Lee, which is in the middle of the apparent offer. Pay attention to it!

Disposal of alliances and union words

Unions	Union words
1. Are not members of the proposal, for example: He said the sister will not return to dinner (What is the Union, is not a member of the sentence).	1. Are members of the pressing proposal, for example: She did not take her eyes off the road, what leads through groves (Union Word What is subject to).
2. Often (but not always!) Union can be removed from the Put Office, Wed: He said the sister would not return to dinner. - He said: the sister will not return to dinner.	2. Since the Allied Word is a member of the Putting Office, it cannot be removed without changing the meaning, for example: She did not take her eyes off the road, what leads through groves; It is impossible: She did not reduce the eye from the road, leads through a grove.
3. A logical emphasis can not fall on the union.	3. A logical emphasis may fall on the Allied Word, for example: I know what he will do tomorrow.
4. After the union it is impossible to put particles, it is.	4. After the union word, you can put particles, it is, Wed: I know what he will do tomorrow; I know exactly what it will do tomorrow.
5. The union can not be replaced with an index pronoun or prime adverb.	5. The Allied Word can be replaced by an index pronoun or prime defensed, Wed: I know what he will do tomorrow. - I know: it will do it tomorrow; I know where he was yesterday. - I know: there he was yesterday.

Note!

1) What, how, when can be both unions and allied words. Therefore, when analyzing complex proposals with these words, it is necessary to be particularly attentive. In addition to the above methods of delimitation of unions and allied words, the following should be considered.

When is soyuce in pressing time ( My father died when I was the sixteenth year. Leskov) and in the apparent condition ( When needed, it's necessary to go to hell! Gogol).

When is union word in the apparent additional ( I know, when he will return) and in the apparent determination ( That day, when ; When in a determined pressing, it is possible to replace the main word for this by the union word that, Wed: TOT day, in which We met for the first time, I will never forget).

As is soyuce In all the circumstantial attachments, except for the apparent images of action and degree (Wed: Serve me how you served him (Pushkin) - Puttingular comparative; Like a soul of black, so soaps do not wash (Proverb) - Pressure Conditions; You can replace: if the soul of Chern. - Do so as We were taught - Pressing image and degree).

Especially carefully disassemble the apparent extra: in them, both that can be both unions and allied words.

Wed: He said he would come back to dinner (what - Union). - I know, what He will do tomorrow (what - Union Word); I heard you crying a child behind the wall (as - Union). - I know, as She loves the Son (as - Union Word).

In the apparent additional union how can I replace the union that, Wed: I heard the child crying behind the wall. "I heard that a child cried behind the wall.

2) What is soyuce In two cases:

but) As part of a double union than ... Top:

b) In the apparent such complex proposals that are in the main part of the adjective, adequate in a comparative degree or the word other, other, otherwise.

He was rustier than we thought; Than to consider work to work, no better for yourself, kuma, turn (Wings).

3) Where, where, from where, who, why, why, how much, which, whose, whose - Union words and can not be unions.

I know where he hides; I know where he will go; I know who did it; I know why he did it; I know why he said it; I know how much time he went to repair the apartment; I know how our holiday will be; I know whose briefcase is.

With the analysis of the pressing proposal, as simple, the following error is very often allowed: the value of the apparent is transferred to the meaning of the union word. To prevent such an error, try replacing the Allied Word with a corresponding indicative word and determine what a member of the sentence is this word.

Wed: I know where he hides. - There He hides.

Union words which, what, whose In the definition, it is possible to replace the nouns to which this is an apparent.

Wed: Tell me that fairy tale that Mom loved (Hermann). - The fairy tale Mom loved; Stewart Yakovlevich - such a helper, which is not in the world. - Of such a helper And there is no light.

Inverse error is possible: the meaning of the union word is transferred to the value of the apparent one. To not be mistaken, put a question from the main offer to the apparent.

I know (what?), when he will return; I know (what?), where he was - apparent additional; He returned to the city (in what city?), where spent his youth; That day (what day?), when We met, I will never forget - Puttingal definitions.

In addition, in the definition of allied words Where, where, from where, when can be replaced by the union word that.

Wed: He returned to the city, where Held youth. - He returned to the city, in which took youth; That day, when We met, I will not forget. - That day, in which We met, I will not forget.

4. Indexing words are in the main sentence and are usually responsible for the same questions, they have the same syntax value as the apparent offers. The main function of indicative words is to be a precursor of the pressing offer. Therefore, in most cases, the indicative word can suggest to which type includes an apparent offer:

He returned to B. tOT city, where Spent youth (tOT - definition; apparent determination); He stayed with topicsto prove your innocence (with topics - the circumstance of the goal; Pressing goal); Read so that Nobody saw notes (so - the circumstance of the image, measures and degrees; Pressing image and degree).

Way of expression of indicative words

Discharge	List of words	Examples
1. Indexing pronouns and prime adverbs	That, this one, there, there, from there, then, so, so much, so because therefore and etc.	So that gift that he promised her to do in ten years (POUST). Read so so that no one has seen (Leskov). No greatness where there is no simplicity, good and truth (L. Tolstoy).
2. Determined pronouns and prime adverbs	All, all, everyone, every, everywhere, everywhere, always and etc.	All day that we spent in Zagorsk, I remember minutes (Fedoseyev). Wherever we visited, the traces of desolation (Soloohin).
3. Negative pronouns and prime adverbs	Nobody, nothing, nowhere, never and etc.	I do not know anyone who could replace the old graph (Leskov).
4. Uncertain pronouns and prime adverbs	Someone, something, somewhere when and etc.	For some reason, we did not guess about, everyone spoke in a whisper in a whisper and walked a little heard (Leskov).
5. Nouns and whole combinations of nouns with indicable pronouns	Under the condition (which if, when), at that time (when, as), in the event (when, if), for the reason (which), with the goal (so that), to such an extent (which)	And this is possible if he himself refers to words is not indifferent and unusual (Marshak). I decided to dinner one for the reason that lunch accounted for the Watching Boutler Watch (Green).

Complex proposals, it is well known, represent the structures in which more than one simple sentence. are divided into three types:

complex non-union (SBP),
complexed (SSP),
complexed proposals (SPP).

Each type has its own features, but in speech their role is similar: complex and complex proposals, as well as the non-union, are made to the most informative, allow you to transfer different semantic relations, express stylistic features speech. SSP, SBP, SNPs are most often used in the book speech. For they often find themselves cumbersome.

Completed proposals are one of the most complex and diverse types of syntactic structures.

They call the SSP such a syntactic structure in which the parts are connected or allied words. It follows from this that in the NGN part are not equal. The dependent part is called a presidency. The part that she obeys - the main one. The union or allied word is included in the apparent. ( When it became hotMaxim went to the balcony. She did not come for a holiday, because the mood was ruled.)

Parts of the NGN are linked structurally and in meaning. It often happens that the main part is simply incomprehensible, and therefore it cannot exist without apparent. (She felt that her stupid face will still have consequences. I'm the one then stops finally this disgrace).

Depending on the unions and the values \u200b\u200bof the apparent part, complex proposals are divided into types. Some philological schools share the apparent proposals for two groups: definition and additional. However, most scientists adhere to another opinion, divided complex proposals for 10 species on the value of the apparent. It is this classification that is studied at school.

Answer the question (what?). In them are appointed by alliances (where, from where, whose, etc.) or by the union words (as if, exactly, as if).

*Note. Union words are members of the sentence, unions are not.

Examples. From the apartment opposite came the screams (what?), who were not allowed to fall asleep. The window was visible to the window (what?), O the outflow of the occasionally came in incomprehensible rumble. I saw her such (what?), as if she just went with a photo.

Complete sentences with for communication parts are used by alliances (such that, as if), allied words (who, from where, how). The additives in them are responsible for this, the main sign of the apparent extaste. (She once again assured in that (in what?) that the delegation is delayed. She returned the kiss to those (who?), who was waiting for this for so long.).

Completely complex images of action (as? To what extent? How much?) Using alliances (as, as if, exactly, etc.), allied words (as far as). (He prepared so much (how much?) how much time allowed and his meager mind.)

Pressure places (where? Where?) Using allied words (where, where and there are similar) (I will live there (where?), where the sun dives into the sea every day.)

Pressing time (what time? How much?) Join with the help of relative words (as long as when, before, etc.) (I will repeat until how much? How much?), until you remember.)

There are other types of complex proposals - these are subordinate to the apparent

Conditions (I will forgive you (with what condition?), E if you correct your mistake.)

Reasons (I was very surprised for the reason that was not ready for his output.)

Goals (I'll be back we could make the world more beautiful.)

Comparative (we were so delighted, as if faith was a relative to us.)

Sentifying (he had everything from her hands, as if Senka did not try. Contrary to whisper, accompanying it everywhere, Nelli walked with proudly raised head.)

Corollary (he cooked, t aK that it took a bad turn.)

Attachments (he was wrong what and hurried to voluntarily admit.)