Results of the exam in social studies. Analysis of the social studies exam in the form of the Unified State Exam

Almost 14% of Unified State Examination participants in social studies did not pass the minimum threshold in 2017, and this figure was lower than in 2016. Sergei Kravtsov, head of the Federal Service for Supervision of Education and Science (Rosobrnadzor), told reporters about this.

“The average scores in all three subjects in 2017 are comparable to the results of last year. The number of participants who failed to overcome the established minimum threshold in subjects has decreased: in social studies - to 13.8% from 17.5% last year, in physics - up to 3.8% from 6.1%, according to literature - up to 2.9% from 4.4% a year earlier", he clarified.

The head of Rosobrnadzor also noted that Unified State Exam results on these subjects have already been transferred to the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. “The results went to the regions one day earlier”, - explained S. Kravtsov.

During the main period, about 318 thousand participants took the Unified State Examination in social studies, more than 155 thousand people in physics, and more than 41 thousand participants in literature.

The main period of the Unified State Exam 2017 runs from May 29 to July 1. About 703 thousand people plan to take part in the exams, of which about 617 thousand are graduates current year. Exams are held in all regions of the Russian Federation, as well as in 52 countries abroad.

Rosobrnadzor summed up the preliminary results of the Unified State Examination in social studies, literature and physics. This year, more students were able to overcome the minimum threshold than last year, the press service of Rosobrnadzor reported, citing the head of the service, Sergei Kravtsov.

. . . . .

Kravtsov explained the decrease in the number of schoolchildren who were unable to overcome the minimum threshold by the fact that the results of the Unified State Exam are used in the work of institutes for advanced training of teachers. Thanks to the use of technology for scanning participants' work at examination points, the Unified State Examination results in social studies, literature and physics were processed ahead of the deadlines established by the schedule for issuing results. Graduates will be able to find out their results a day earlier.

Members of the United state exam(Unified State Examination) in Russian will be able to find out their results five days earlier than planned. . . . . .

“Five days earlier, the participants will learn their results in the Russian language - that’s 700 thousand people, this has never happened before, so that schoolchildren can get their results and safely hold their graduation ceremony. This is very important, this does not exist anywhere in the world.”, - emphasized S. Kravtsov.

In turn, Deputy Head of Rosobrnadzor Anzor Muzaev noted that the results will be transferred to the regions on June 22, 2017. "On Thursday, June 22, everyone educational institutions will have data, referring to which, they will be able to issue certificates", he explained.

The Unified State Examination in the Russian language took place on June 9. 628 thousand people signed up to take part in the exam, and 5.4 thousand examination points (PPE) were used to conduct it. It was previously reported that exam participants will learn their results no later than June 27, 2017.

. . . . .

On the official website of FIPI in the section "Analytical and teaching materials"published" Guidelines for teachers, prepared on the basis of analysis typical mistakes participants of the Unified State Exam 2017", this is where you can find information about Which GPA The Unified State Exam in Social Studies was held in 2017.

Download the document.

Table 1

Average USE score 2017 in social studies

Total number of participants on the main day of the main period of the Unified State Exam in 2017 – 317,883 people, which, as in previous years, amounted to more than half (55%) of total number Unified State Examination participants.

Social studies is the most popular exam taken at the discretion of graduates, which has led to extreme heterogeneity in the level of preparation of the contingent of exam participants. The demand for exam results for admission to various specialties is due to the fact that the exam includes testing the fundamentals of socio-philosophical, economic, sociological and legal knowledge and provides high requirements to the level of training of graduates (a high level of requirements applies even to obtaining a minimum score).

A special feature of the contingent of participants in the Unified State Exam in social studies is its extreme heterogeneity: a certain proportion of participants have a high level of social science training and are purposefully preparing to enter the humanities at leading universities, but there is also a large proportion of participants with poor preparation, who are not able to pass exams in science and science. exact sciences or considering the Unified State Exam in social studies as a backup option.

Average Test Score in 2017 was 55.44, which is 2.3 points higher than in 2016 (53.14).

Raising the average test score may be due to the effectiveness of a set of measures to improve the quality of testing tasks with a detailed answer (methodological materials for experts of subject commissions, webinars, introduction additional condition assigning the work of Unified State Exam participants to the third test), as well as the almost complete exclusion from the number of participants in the main period of the exam of graduates of previous years who showed the lowest results. The participation rate of current year graduates is 98.98.

Proportion of participants who did not receive minimum score, in 2017 decreased compared to 2016 and amounted to 13.8% (in 2016 – 17.6%). In addition to the above circumstances that influenced the increase in the average Unified State Exam score, in this case emphasis should be added methodological work at the federal level and the level of constituent entities of the Russian Federation on differentiated training of graduates with different potential, assistance to students from the group “at risk of not getting the minimum score.” The number of 100-point students in 2017 increased compared to 2016: 142 versus 59, their share of the total number of participants doubled (0.04% and 0.02%, respectively).

In 2017, the share of high-scoring students increased to 4.46% compared to 2016 (from 3.11% in 2016), which is understandable given the trend of increasing average test scores and improving the quality of work of subject commissions, as well as the formation methodological approaches to organizing pre-exam preparation for Unified State Examination participants.

Analysis of the social studies exam in Unified State Examination form

Number of students: 3

Number of people who wrote the work: 3

Teacher: Zalevskaya N.I.

Absolute academic performance: 100%

Analysis of the exam in the form of the Unified State Exam showed the following:

Part 1 contains 20 short answer tasks, tasks of two difficulty levels: 10 basic level tasks and 10 advanced level tasks. Maximum primary score - 35

IN exam paper The following types of short-answer tasks are proposed:

Tasks for choosing and recording one or more correct answers from the proposed list of answers;

Identification task structural elements concepts using diagrams and tables;

The task is to establish correspondence between positions presented in two sets;

A task to differentiate facts and opinions in social information;

The task is to define terms and concepts corresponding to the proposed context.

Tasks 1-3 are aimed at testing knowledge and understanding of the biosocial essence of a person, the main stages and factors of socialization of the individual, patterns and trends in the development of society, the main social institutions and processes, etc.

Tasks 4-19 include tasks of basic and advanced levels aimed at testing the development of skills: characterize from a scientific point of view, the main social objects (facts, phenomena, processes, institutions), their place and significance in the life of society as an integral system; search social information presented in various sign systems(text, diagram, table, diagram); apply socio-economic and humanitarian knowledge in the process of solving cognitive tasks according to current social problems. The tasks in this group represent the traditional five thematic modules of the social science course: man and society, including cognition and spiritual culture (tasks 4-6); economics (tasks 7-10), social relations (tasks 11, 12); politics (tasks 13-15); law (tasks 16-19).

Task 20 is aimed at testing the skills: analyze and summarize disordered social information; distinguish it contains facts and opinions, arguments and conclusions; explain internal and external connections (cause-and-effect and functional) of the studied social objects (including interactions between man and society, society and nature, society and culture, subsystems and structural elements of the social system, social qualities person.

Part 2 contains 9 tasks with detailed answers, two tasks of a basic level (21 and 22) and seven tasks of a high level of complexity (23-29). The maximum primary score is 27.

Tasks 21 and 22 are aimed primarily at identifying the ability to find, consciously perceive and accurately reproduce information contained in the text explicitly (task 21), as well as apply it in a given context.

Task 23 is aimed at characterizing (or explaining, or specifying) the text or its individual provisions based on the course studied, based on contextual social science knowledge.

Task 24 involves the use of text information in another cognitive situation, independent formulation and argumentation of evaluative, predictive and other judgments related to the problems of the text.

Task 25 tests the ability to independently discover the meaning of key social science concepts and apply them in a given context.

Task 26 tests the ability to concretize the studied theoretical positions and concepts with examples. social sciences, forming a social science course.

Assignment task 27 requires: analysis of the information presented, including statistical and graphical information; explanations of the connection between social objects and processes; formulation and argumentation of independent evaluative, prognostic and other judgments, explanations, conclusions. This task tests your ability to use

social science knowledge in the process of solving cognitive problems on current social problems.

Task 28 requires drawing up a plan for a detailed answer on a specific topic in a social science course. When completing tasks of this type skills are revealed: to systematize and summarize social information; establish and reflect in the structure of the plan structural, functional, hierarchical and other connections of social objects, phenomena, processes.

The work is completed by alternative task 29, which aims the examinee to write a mini-essay on one of the five proposed topics.

Tasks 1-3, 10, 12 are scored 1 point. The task is considered completed correctly if the answer is written in the form specified in the instructions for completing the task.

Correct completion of tasks 4-9, 11, 13-20 is scored 2 points. These tasks are scored as follows: complete correct completion of the task - 2 points; completing a task with one error (one incorrectly indicated, including an extra, digit along with all the correct digits) OR incomplete completion of the task (missing one required digit) - 1 point; incorrect completion of the task (indicating two or more incorrect numbers) - 0 points.

Complete correct completion of the tasks in Part 2 is scored from 2 to 5 points. For complete correct completion of tasks 21, 22, 2 points are awarded; tasks 23-28 - 3 points each; tasks 29 - 5 points.

Total - 29 tasks (62 points).

The analysis showed that students completed the tasks of Part 1 better compared to the trial exam held in April 2017 (Fig. 1)

Picture 1.

Comparative analysis completing tasks of part 1

The analysis showed that students completed the tasks of Part 2 better compared to the trial exam held in April 2017 (Fig. 2)

Figure 2.

Comparative analysis of task completion, part 2

The analysis showed that students improved their performance on tasks at the basic, advanced and high levels (Table 1).

Table 1.

Comparative analysis of task completion (by difficulty level)

Class average - 57,7 (on mock exam - 44,6 ).

Analysis of the task performance showed that students completed:

- 56 % of tasks of group 1 (trial - 44% );

- 89 % of tasks from the section "Man and Society, Including Cognition and Spiritual Culture" (trial - 44 %);

- 76 % of tasks from the “Economics” section (trial - 45,5 %);

- 78 % of tasks from the section " Social relations"(trial - 41,5 %);

- 50 % of tasks from the “Politics” section (trial - 50 %);

- 58 % of tasks from the “Law” section (trial - 62 %);

- 100 % of task No. 20 (trial - 66 %);

- 35 % of tasks part 2 (trial - 11 %).

Difficulties were caused by tasks 3, 17 ( a basic level of); 15, 18 (increased level); 24-29 (high level).